Newsroom
22 June, 2026 / News / AI / Tags: adults, republicans, pew, democrats, republican

A Pew Research Center survey shows 22% of Republicans have engaged with crypto compared to 17% of Democrats, marking a clear shift in partisan adoption patterns
A recent Pew Research Center poll of 8,512 U.S. adults conducted at the end of January reveals that Republicans and Republican-leaning independents now lead in cryptocurrency participation. Twenty-two percent reported having invested in, traded, or used digital assets such as Bitcoin or Ether. Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents stood at 17%.
This marks the first time Republicans have pulled ahead. Prior to 2026, ownership rates between the two groups were roughly equal. Republican participation has risen steadily from 16% in 2021 to the current 22% level.
Supporting data from Morning Consult highlights an even larger gap during the second quarter of 2025. In that period, 27.9% of Republicans reported buying or selling crypto in the past year, compared to 17.3% of Democrats. This created an 11-point difference at its peak.
The shift aligns with broader changes in how different political groups view digital assets. What began as similar participation levels across party lines has evolved into a noticeable divide.
Former President Donald Trump previously expressed skepticism toward cryptocurrencies. In 2019, he described them as unregulated and potentially enabling illegal activities. His stance changed in subsequent years.
Trump entered the space in 2022 with an NFT collection featuring digital trading cards. The Trump family later expanded involvement through additional NFT projects, the World Liberty Financial platform, and memecoins including $TRUMP and $MELANIA. These steps placed them directly within the industry.
Efforts under the current administration have included proposals aimed at positioning the United States as a leader in digital assets, such as measures that could enable more crypto firms to operate with bank-like status.
Political affiliation is not the only factor. Morning Consult data shows that men make up about 74% of crypto investors. The gender gap is particularly wide among those under 45, where male participation ranged from 38% to 42% between 2022 and 2026, while female participation in the same age group was 13% to 16%.
Ethnic breakdowns indicate that around 25% of Asian American adults have engaged with crypto. Black and Hispanic adults report similar rates. White adults have increased from 13% in 2021 to 18% currently, matching the levels seen in Black and Hispanic communities for the first time.
Beyond individual adoption, the crypto sector has increased its role in political campaigns. Fairshake, a major pro-crypto political action committee, and affiliated groups have directed significant resources toward supportive candidates.
In Alabama, the group spent $9.8 million on advertisements backing Republican Representative Barry Moore, with total expenditures reaching $12.1 million including other campaign efforts. Fairshake entered May with approximately $150 million available, much of it reserved for broader election activities.
Moore, who has supported crypto-related legislation, faces competition in the Republican primary. Trump has endorsed him in the race. Similar efforts have not succeeded everywhere, such as in Illinois where substantial spending against a Democratic candidate did not prevent that candidate's primary victory.
The Pew findings and related data point to crypto's growing integration into American political and economic discussions. The widening partisan gap reflects changing attitudes and increased visibility of digital assets in public discourse.
Industry groups continue to engage with lawmakers on issues affecting the sector, while individual participation rates evolve along demographic and political lines. These developments occur as various stakeholders monitor regulatory and market conditions.
The intersection of politics and digital finance remains active, with both voter behavior and campaign financing showing measurable shifts in recent years.









