Newsroom
27 September, 2026 / News / AI / Tags: bitfinex, ethena, million, transfers, profit

A long-term Ether holder transferred 112,053 ETH worth roughly $300 million to Bitfinex over one week while realizing $72.83 million in profit, as another whale withdrew 18.34 million ENA tokens valued at about $5.13 million from major exchanges
A long-term Ether holder or institution moved a total of 112,053 ETH to the Bitfinex exchange across one week. The cumulative value of those transfers reached approximately $300 million. The most recent portion of the activity involved 30,825 ETH, valued at $83.03 million, and occurred within a nine-hour window.
The same entity realized an estimated $72.83 million in profit from the week's activity. The holder had maintained the position for roughly three years after withdrawing 130,592 ETH from Bitfinex in 2023 at an average price of $2,026 per token. Market participants noted that the scale of the transfers represented substantial profit-taking from a sizable long-held position and could introduce additional selling pressure.
Separately, a whale address identified as 0xd0A4 withdrew 18.34 million Ethena (ENA) tokens from four centralized exchanges. The tokens carried a combined value of about $5.13 million. The withdrawals took place on Gate, Bybit, OKX and Binance.
Ethena operates as a crypto protocol whose ENA token is available for trading on the platforms involved in the activity. The movement of tokens off exchanges is often interpreted as a shift toward longer-term holding or reduced immediate selling intent, though the precise motivation remains undisclosed.
Both sets of transactions occurred on the same day and involved sizable positions relative to typical daily flows. The Ether transfers originated from a wallet that had remained inactive for an extended period following its 2023 withdrawal, while the ENA activity concentrated across several of the largest trading venues. Together the moves illustrate continued large-scale repositioning by major crypto holders amid ongoing market conditions.
No additional details on the identities behind the wallets or any subsequent trading activity were disclosed in available reports. The Ether position alone accounted for the majority of the capital involved, dwarfing the ENA withdrawals in absolute size.









