Newsroom
19 September, 2026 / News / AI / Tags: quantum, sigel, matthew, vaneck, bitcoin

VanEck research head Matthew Sigel says the network’s developers and major firms are actively preparing for potential quantum computing threats through proposals like BIP-360
Quantum computing poses a recognized long-term risk to Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations, yet the decentralized community has already begun coordinated efforts to strengthen the network against future advances in the technology. Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Assets Research at asset manager VanEck, outlined the situation in a CNBC interview on Friday, noting that while progress moves more slowly than in centralized systems, technical pathways for quantum resistance are under active development.
Current quantum computers remain limited by high error rates and lack the capability to compromise Bitcoin’s cryptography. No machine exists today that can break the network’s security. Bitcoin continues to operate as the world’s largest computer network, sustained by its distributed structure.
Sigel described quantum computing as a genuine risk while emphasizing that the Bitcoin community fully understands its scope. Talent across developers and institutions has coalesced around frameworks for system upgrades. He pointed out that the absence of a central authority means changes follow a governance process that takes longer and can appear messier than corporate directives, yet viable technological routes already exist.
He added that upgrades cannot be ordered by a CEO and instead require broader consensus. Over the next couple of years, more concrete progress toward quantum resistance is expected.
Bitcoin developers have started testing quantum-resistant signatures on live sidechains. These parallel networks allow experimentation without exposing the main chain to risk. Sidechain trials form part of a broader precautionary approach as quantum research advances.
Major industry participants are contributing resources. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, announced plans in July for a post-quantum signing pipeline. The design relies on secure enclaves and threshold cryptography to protect digital assets even if quantum capabilities improve substantially.
Infrastructure firm Blockstream is also engaged in related work. In the same month, a Bitcoin Security Consortium formed with participation from BlackRock, Fidelity Digital Assets, Block, and other organizations. The group channels funding and engineering expertise into open-source initiatives that support quantum-resilient proposals.
One focal point is BIP-360, a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal that introduces a new transaction output type. The change aims to shorten the period during which public keys remain exposed, thereby reducing vulnerability to potential future quantum attacks that could exploit prolonged visibility of those keys.
By limiting exposure windows, the proposal seeks to raise the practical difficulty of any quantum-enabled compromise of transaction security. Support from the consortium underscores institutional interest in embedding such defenses into the protocol.
Although capable quantum machines remain theoretical for Bitcoin’s purposes, the combination of developer testing, exchange-level pipelines, and consortium-backed proposals demonstrates that preparation is already in motion. The decentralized governance model ensures that any protocol changes undergo thorough review, aligning security evolution with the network’s core design principles.









