Newsroom
11 July, 2026 / News / AI / 826 reads / Tags: electricity, cambridge, percent, nodes, gwh

Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance reports Ethereum now uses just 7.87 GWh of electricity annually, a massive reduction from pre-Merge levels
The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance has released detailed findings on Ethereum's power usage following its 2022 transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake. The network's annual electricity consumption now stands at approximately 7.87 gigawatt-hours, marking a reduction of more than 99.9 percent compared to earlier estimates.
Before the change, Ethereum required around 8.88 terawatt-hours per year under the proof-of-work system. Continuous power demand fell from 2.4 gigawatts to just 0.90 megawatts. Carbon emissions dropped to about 2.37 kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent annually, representing a near-complete elimination of the previous footprint.
The Merge replaced energy-intensive mining with a system where participants secure the chain by staking ETH. This removed the need for specialized hardware running complex calculations. Validators now handle transaction confirmation and network security through economic commitment rather than computational competition.
Researchers examined real hardware across about 8,522 publicly reachable full nodes. Average node power draw came to roughly 105 watts, with residential setups at a median of 18 watts. The study accounted for different client configurations and actual operating conditions rather than theoretical models.
Ethereum nodes show concentration in specific regions. The United States accounts for around 31 percent of observable full nodes, followed by Germany at 16 percent, Finland at 8 percent, and France at 6 percent. These four countries together represent about 62 percent of the infrastructure.
Approximately 64 percent of nodes operate in cloud or enterprise data centers, while 36 percent run on residential hardware. Major providers including Hetzner, Amazon Web Services, and OVH handle a substantial portion of hosting. This geographic and operational profile now plays a larger role in determining the network's remaining environmental impact than the consensus method itself.
| Metric | Before Merge (PoW) | After Merge (PoS) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Electricity | 8.88 TWh | 7.87 GWh |
| Power Demand | 2.4 GW | 0.90 MW |
| CO₂ Emissions | ~10,000 ktCO₂e | 2.37 ktCO₂e |
Current estimates indicate 56.4 percent of Ethereum's electricity comes from sustainable sources, including 39.4 percent from renewables and 17 percent from nuclear. Natural gas remains the largest single contributor at 27.7 percent. The report notes that further improvements in the network's carbon profile will depend primarily on the energy mixes of the grids where nodes operate.
For context, Ethereum's post-Merge electricity use is less than half that of the British Museum, which consumes around 16.18 GWh annually. This places the blockchain's ongoing requirements at a scale comparable to small institutional operations.
The analysis also referenced the roughly 894,000 active validators contributing to network security through staked ETH. Combined with full nodes, this structure maintains the chain's operation at significantly lower energy levels.
The Cambridge study provides one of the most comprehensive assessments based on observable infrastructure data. It underscores the direct effects of the consensus change on operational demands. As node operators select hosting and energy options, the network's total impact continues to evolve according to real-world conditions across different locations.









